Skip to content

2×2 Contingency Table Calculator

Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, odds ratio, relative risk and attributable risk.

Confidence level

Enter your values to see the result.

Fisher's exact test is preferred when any expected count is below 5. The chi-square test is shown with and without Yates' continuity correction. Results use standard large-sample formulas and are meant to support, not replace, a statistician's review. Check the assumptions behind each method before you report the numbers.

Continue your work

Share this tool

Found it useful? Send it to a friend or teammate.

Rate this tool

0.0

0 ratings

  • 5 stars 0
  • 4 stars 0
  • 3 stars 0
  • 2 stars 0
  • 1 star 0

Click a star to rate this tool

Clear instructions

Find steps, examples and limitations below.

Use online

Open the tool in a supported web browser.

Free to use

No sign-up required. Tool-specific limits may apply.

How to use the 2×2 Contingency Table Calculator

Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, odds ratio, relative risk and attributable risk.

  1. 1 Enter the four cell counts for exposed and unexposed groups.
  2. 2 Choose the confidence level for the effect measures.
  3. 3 Read the test results; Fisher’s exact test is used when expected counts are small.

Example and practical tips

12 of 50 exposed and 4 of 50 unexposed people have the outcome: χ² = 4.76, p = 0.029, and the odds ratio is 3.63.

Frequently asked questions

When should I use Fisher’s exact test?

When any expected count is below 5. The chi-square approximation is unreliable with small expected counts.

What does Yates’ correction do?

It makes the chi-square test more conservative for 2×2 tables. It is often too conservative, so both versions are shown.

Report an issue

Something broken or not quite right? Tell us and we will look into it.